This one could possibly open a new debate on adoption and maternity benefits.
I call upon the archaic law of maternity benefits dated 1961 to explain to the citizens of this country why parenthood was singled out as a status achieved through conception alone??
WHO IS ENTITLED TO MATERNITY BENEFIT · Every woman employee, whether employed directly or through a contractor, who has actually worked in the establishment for a period of at least 80 days during the 12 months immediately preceding the date of her expected delivery, is entitled to receive maternity benefit. · The qualifying period of 80 days shall not apply to a woman who has immigrated into the State of Assam and was pregnant at the time of immigration. · For calculating the number of days on which a woman has actually worked during the preceding 12 months, the days on which she has been laid off or was on holidays with wages shall also be counted. · There is neither a wage ceiling for coverage under the Act nor there is any restriction as regards the type of work a woman is engaged in. The term pregnancy is central to the idea of maternity as is self revealing. I am sure even then the word mother meant the same as today in the English dictionary (I was born slightly later than 1961 !!). Mother means the same to a CHILD and maternity means the same to a mother - adopted or otherwise. I am sure that the law makers then could not conceive maternity sans conception. Choosing not to wail over spilt milk I would like to move on from here. These are good times. These are changing times. This is the new century where no longer will corporate Moving on I also wish to call for all HR professionals engaged in archaic compliances to revisit rules book and think positively. Lets form a forum where we can support the government to make amends for lapses caused int he past. This is the time to do it. The moment of truth has truly arrived. |
No comments:
Post a Comment